LIPIX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIPIX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - LIPIX is a Target Retirement Date fund tracking the BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Custom Benchmark (USD), while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, LIPIX returned 11.99%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for FASGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIPIX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LIPIX having a 12.45% return and FASGX slightly lower at 11.93%. Over the past 10 years, LIPIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

LIPIX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 28.60%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIPIX BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional	12.45%	20.70%	15.61%	21.25%	-18.33%	18.68%	14.23%	26.72%	-7.86%	21.38%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LIPIX and FASGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011	0.97

The correlation between LIPIX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIPIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIPIX

LIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 67
LIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIPIX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.61	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.64	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.39	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.10	14.98	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIPIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIPIX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.61	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.69	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.79	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.63	0.00

Drawdowns

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIPIX drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIPIX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIPIX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-47.35%	+13.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-7.95%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.98%	-12.80%	-3.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.39%	-23.54%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	-27.20%	-7.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-6.71%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.79%	+0.26%

Volatility

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that LIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIPIX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.30%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	8.39%	+1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	10.34%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	12.27%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	12.65%	+3.86%

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIPIX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIPIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

LIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
LIPIX BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional	2.47%	2.77%	2.45%	2.10%	2.03%	2.15%	1.08%	3.29%	2.37%	2.31%	1.57%	3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIPIX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, LIPIX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIPIX or FASGX?

LIPIX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to FASGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIPIX dropped -34.29% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.