LINT vs. AAPX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AAPX.

Performance

LINT vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than AAPX's 15.91% return.

LINT

• 1D: 22.09%
• 1M: -34.82%
• 6M: 182.15%
• YTD: 347.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AAPX

• 1D: 4.25%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 19.97%
• YTD: 15.91%
• 1Y: 93.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	$2.43M	$2.16M	$2.18M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$20.13M	$20.02M	$34.55M

LINT vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	347.15%	5.81%
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	15.91%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and AAPX is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.09

LINT vs. AAPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LINT	AAPX
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LINT vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LINT vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LINT	AAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.03	—

Drawdowns

LINT vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and AAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	AAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.02%	-58.55%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.88%	-17.66%	-36.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-18.64%	-5.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	AAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	41.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	170.36%	51.78%	+118.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	170.36%	55.87%	+114.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	170.36%	55.87%	+114.49%

LINT vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than AAPX's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.57%	0.67%	21.46%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.61%	0.25%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and AAPX in my portfolio?

LINT and AAPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or AAPX?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or AAPX?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or AAPX?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.57% for AAPX.

What is the main difference between LINT and AAPX?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.05% for AAPX.