LINT vs. USML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LINT is actively managed, while USML is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USML.

Performance

LINT vs. USML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly higher than USML's 2.96% return.

LINT

• 1D: 9.00%
• 1M: 30.35%
• YTD: 562.84%
• 6M: 362.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USML

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 2.80%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 8.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. USML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	562.84%	5.79%
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	2.96%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and USML is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

LINT vs. USML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USML

USML Risk / Return Rank: 11
USML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
USML Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
USML Omega Ratio Rank: 10
USML Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
USML Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. USML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LINT	USML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	24.05	0.44	+23.61

Drawdowns

LINT vs. USML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than USML's maximum drawdown of -35.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and USML.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	USML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.54%	-35.34%	-14.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.55%	-3.69%	-22.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.51%	-10.41%	-10.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	USML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	163.04%	16.38%	+146.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	163.04%	24.47%	+138.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	163.04%	24.29%	+138.75%

LINT vs. USML - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than USML's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. USML - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while USML has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.13%	0.25%
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and USML in my portfolio?

LINT and USML have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or USML?

On fees, USML is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or USML?

USML is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or USML?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for USML.

What is the main difference between LINT and USML?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.95% for USML.