LINT vs. UMI
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.
Performance
LINT vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 744.89% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 23.69% return.
LINT
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 744.89%
- 6M
- 773.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMI
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 6M
- 23.28%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.61%
- 10Y*
- —
LINT vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 744.89% | 5.81% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 23.69% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and UMI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.08 |
LINT vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LINT
UMI
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LINT
UMI
-
Basic Materials
LINT
-
UMI
-
Communication Services
LINT
-
UMI
-
Consumer Cyclical
LINT
-
UMI
-
Consumer Defensive
LINT
-
UMI
-
Energy
LINT
-
UMI
Financial Services
LINT
-
UMI
-
Healthcare
LINT
-
UMI
-
Industrials
LINT
-
UMI
-
Real Estate
LINT
-
UMI
-
Utilities
LINT
-
UMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UMI
LINT vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINT | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINT vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and UMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.54% | -48.08% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -3.85% | -9.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -6.58% | -13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 168.83% | 14.28% | +154.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.83% | 19.46% | +149.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.83% | 23.16% | +145.67% |
LINT vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than UMI's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.10% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 5.93% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and UMI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.
LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.85% for UMI.
Find the right allocation for LINT and UMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer