PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINT vs. UMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINT vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 744.89% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 23.69% return.


LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMI

1D
1.58%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
23.69%
6M
23.28%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
28.51%
5Y*
20.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LINT and UMI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.08

LINT vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LINT
UMI

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

LINT
100.0%
UMI

-

Basic Materials

LINT

-

UMI

-

Communication Services

LINT

-

UMI

-

Consumer Cyclical

LINT

-

UMI

-

Consumer Defensive

LINT

-

UMI

-

Energy

LINT

-

UMI
99.0%

Financial Services

LINT

-

UMI

-

Healthcare

LINT

-

UMI

-

Industrials

LINT

-

UMI

-

Real Estate

LINT

-

UMI

-

Utilities

LINT

-

UMI
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINT vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UMI
UMI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINTUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

LINT vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINT vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and UMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINTUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-48.08%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-3.85%

-9.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.48%

-6.58%

-13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

Volatility

LINT vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINTUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

168.83%

14.28%

+154.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.83%

19.46%

+149.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.83%

23.16%

+145.67%

LINT vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINT vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than UMI's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
0.10%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
5.93%6.23%4.39%4.67%4.36%3.00%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LINT and UMI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.85% for UMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and UMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer