LINT vs. SELV
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SELV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their -0.22 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SELV.
Performance
LINT vs. SELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 8.25% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 22.09%
- 1M
- -34.82%
- 6M
- 182.15%
- YTD
- 347.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SELV
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.13M | $20.02M | $34.55M | |
| $568.09K | $486.93K | $528.93K |
LINT vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 347.15% | 5.81% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 8.25% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and SELV is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.22 |
LINT vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LINT
SELV
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LINT
SELV
Basic Materials
LINT
-
SELV
Communication Services
LINT
-
SELV
Consumer Cyclical
LINT
-
SELV
Consumer Defensive
LINT
-
SELV
Energy
LINT
-
SELV
Financial Services
LINT
-
SELV
Healthcare
LINT
-
SELV
Industrials
LINT
-
SELV
Real Estate
LINT
-
SELV
Utilities
LINT
-
SELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SELV
LINT vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINT | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINT vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and SELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.02% | -13.73% | -55.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.88% | 0.00% | -53.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -2.34% | -21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.36% | 9.89% | +160.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 11.98% | +158.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 11.98% | +158.38% |
LINT vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SELV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.61% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and SELV have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.61% for LINT.
LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SELV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.15% for SELV.
Find the right allocation for LINT and SELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer