LINT vs. QTAP
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
LINT vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 15.55% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 22.09%
- 1M
- -34.82%
- 6M
- 182.15%
- YTD
- 347.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 14.80%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.13M | $20.02M | $34.55M | |
| $236.85K | $216.13K | $201.46K |
LINT vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 347.15% | 5.81% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 15.55% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.52 |
LINT vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LINT
QTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LINT
QTAP
Basic Materials
LINT
-
QTAP
Communication Services
LINT
-
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
LINT
-
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
LINT
-
QTAP
Energy
LINT
-
QTAP
Financial Services
LINT
-
QTAP
Healthcare
LINT
-
QTAP
Industrials
LINT
-
QTAP
Real Estate
LINT
-
QTAP
Utilities
LINT
-
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
LINT vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINT vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.02% | -29.44% | -39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.88% | 0.00% | -53.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -4.91% | -19.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.36% | 6.64% | +163.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 18.94% | +151.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 18.56% | +151.80% |
LINT vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.61% | 0.25% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for LINT and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer