LINT vs. MSTP
LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MSTP.
Performance
LINT vs. MSTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 347.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSTP's -75.51% return.
LINT
- 1D
- 22.09%
- 1M
- -34.82%
- 6M
- 182.15%
- YTD
- 347.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MSTP
- 1D
- 5.86%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- 6M
- -66.28%
- YTD
- -75.51%
- 1Y
- -97.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -95.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.13M | $20.02M | $34.55M | |
| $617.78K | $867.20K | $1.09M |
LINT vs. MSTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 347.15% | 5.81% |
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | -75.51% | -50.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINT and MSTP is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINT vs. MSTP — Risk / Return Rank
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTP
LINT vs. MSTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINT | MSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINT vs. MSTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, smaller than the maximum MSTP drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and MSTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINT | MSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.02% | -98.40% | +29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.88% | -97.91% | +44.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -72.56% | +48.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 80.22% | — |
Volatility
LINT vs. MSTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINT | MSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 120.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.36% | 149.36% | +21.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 144.15% | +26.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.36% | 144.15% | +26.21% |
LINT vs. MSTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LINT vs. MSTP - Dividend Comparison
LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.61% | 0.25% |
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LINT and MSTP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.50% for MSTP.
Find the right allocation for LINT and MSTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer