LILAK vs. BAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LILAK (Liberty Latin America Ltd.) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. LILAK operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LILAK returned -13.20%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for BAC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LILAK vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILAK) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LILAK achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LILAK has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of -13.20%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.

LILAK

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 7.40%
• YTD: 15.90%
• 6M: -1.30%
• 1Y: 68.21%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: -10.00%
• 10Y*: -13.20%

BAC

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -4.19%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 25.09%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LILAK vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LILAK Liberty Latin America Ltd.	15.90%	17.67%	-13.62%	-3.42%	-33.33%	2.80%	-39.48%	33.56%	-26.75%	-6.05%
BAC Bank of America Corporation	-4.19%	28.04%	33.85%	4.83%	-23.82%	49.61%	-11.63%	46.19%	-15.00%	35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LILAK and BAC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2015	0.39

The correlation between LILAK and BAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS LILAK : -$3.32 BAC : $4.19
PS Ratio LILAK : 0.27 BAC : 2.27
Total Revenue (TTM) LILAK : $4.44B BAC : $174.85B
Gross Profit (TTM) LILAK : $2.25B BAC : $110.47B
EBITDA (TTM) LILAK : $650.40M BAC : $41.74B

Return for Risk

LILAK vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LILAK

LILAK Risk / Return Rank: 82
LILAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LILAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LILAK Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LILAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LILAK Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BAC

BAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LILAK vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILAK) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LILAK	BAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	0.94	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	1.35	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.17	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	1.12	+1.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	2.89	+5.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LILAK vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LILAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LILAK and BAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LILAK	BAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	0.94	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.24	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.29	0.53	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.20	-0.51

Drawdowns

LILAK vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LILAK drawdown since its inception was -90.14%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LILAK and BAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LILAK	BAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.14%	-93.10%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.55%	-17.93%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.17%	-27.51%	-29.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.20%	-46.64%	-22.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.38%	-48.95%	-38.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.22%	-7.95%	-73.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.09%	-28.32%	-38.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.31%	6.93%	+1.38%

Volatility

LILAK vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILAK) has a higher volatility of 16.32% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.22%. This indicates that LILAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LILAK	BAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.32%	6.22%	+10.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.38%	16.10%	+11.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.53%	21.33%	+17.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.59%	26.85%	+17.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.48%	30.68%	+14.80%

Dividends

LILAK vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

LILAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAC Bank of America Corporation	2.10%	1.96%	2.28%	2.73%	2.60%	1.75%	2.38%	1.87%	2.19%	1.32%	1.13%	1.19%
LILAK Liberty Latin America Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LILAK vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liberty Latin America Ltd. and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LILAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.

LILAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported an operating income of 145.20M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.

LILAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a net income of -22.70M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LILAK and BAC in my portfolio?

LILAK and BAC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LILAK or BAC?

LILAK has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to BAC (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LILAK dropped -90.14% vs BAC's -93.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LILAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.