PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIHIX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2045 Fund Institutional (LIHIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIHIX achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LIHIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.01%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.


LIHIX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.68%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.30%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
11.01%

FASGX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.60%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.33%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIHIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2045 Fund Institutional
10.86%19.01%11.80%20.26%-18.10%17.74%13.93%26.15%-7.55%21.02%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.53%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LIHIX and FASGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.97

The correlation between LIHIX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIHIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIHIX
LIHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LIHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LIHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2045 Fund Institutional (LIHIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIHIXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.23

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

14.28

-0.94

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIHIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIHIXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.48

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.67

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.79

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Drawdowns

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIHIX drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIHIX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIHIXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-47.35%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.95%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-12.80%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-23.54%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-27.20%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.36%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-6.71%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.80%

+0.08%

Volatility

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2045 Fund Institutional (LIHIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIHIXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.31%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

8.40%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

10.35%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

12.26%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

12.65%

+3.09%

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIHIX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIHIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

LIHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than FASGX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.58%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
LIHIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2045 Fund Institutional
2.51%2.78%0.01%2.19%2.01%2.29%1.09%3.32%2.43%2.29%1.55%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LIHIX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIHIX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to FASGX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIHIX dropped -33.31% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIHIX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer