LIFT vs. BNDD
LIFT (LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIFT charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
LIFT vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.
LIFT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- -3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIFT vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 0.72% | 1.16% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 4.32% | -2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFT and BNDD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFT vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
LIFT
BNDD
LIFT vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIFT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | -0.33 | +2.57 |
Drawdowns
LIFT vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFT drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFT and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -30.87% | +30.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -26.51% | +26.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -19.34% | +19.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility
LIFT vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 10.59% | -9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 13.38% | -12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 13.38% | -12.14% |
LIFT vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIFT vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
LIFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.05%, more than BNDD's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.61% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
LIFT LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF | 31.05% | 8.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFT and BNDD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LIFT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LIFT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.
LIFT has the higher dividend yield at 31.05%, compared with 3.61% for BNDD.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIFT and 1.02% for BNDD.
Find the right allocation for LIFT and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer