LIF vs. RBLX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LIF (Life360, Inc.) and RBLX (Roblox Corporation) are both stocks. LIF operates in Software - Application (Technology), while RBLX operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past year, LIF returned -25.93% vs -55.43% for RBLX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LIF vs. RBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -29.45% return, which is significantly higher than RBLX's -46.55% return.

LIF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 17.44%
• YTD: -29.45%
• 6M: -33.03%
• 1Y: -25.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBLX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: -46.55%
• 6M: -51.07%
• 1Y: -55.43%
• 3Y*: 2.45%
• 5Y*: -14.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIF vs. RBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIF Life360, Inc.	-29.45%	55.42%	58.73%
RBLX Roblox Corporation	-46.55%	40.04%	62.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LIF and RBLX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIF : $3.88B RBLX : $30.82B
EPS LIF : $1.75 RBLX : -$1.57
PS Ratio LIF : 7.30 RBLX : 5.71
PB Ratio LIF : 6.49 RBLX : 71.35
Total Revenue (TTM) LIF : $528.98M RBLX : $5.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIF : $407.86M RBLX : $4.16B
EBITDA (TTM) LIF : $26.53M RBLX : -$944.43M

Return for Risk

LIF vs. RBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIF

LIF Risk / Return Rank: 27
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 26
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 30

RBLX

RBLX Risk / Return Rank: 10
RBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
RBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
RBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIF vs. RBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIF	RBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.92	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	-1.32	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.83	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.77	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	-1.30	+0.61

LIF vs. RBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the RBLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIF and RBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIF vs. RBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, smaller than the maximum RBLX drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and RBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIF	RBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.64%	-82.79%	+17.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.64%	-70.82%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-70.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.19%	-69.41%	+10.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.35%	-53.01%	+31.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.82%	41.76%	-0.94%

Volatility

LIF vs. RBLX - Volatility Comparison

Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX) have volatilities of 16.67% and 16.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIF	RBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.67%	16.92%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.85%	47.88%	+4.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.08%	59.45%	+7.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.97%	69.18%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.97%	70.06%	-7.09%

Dividends

LIF vs. RBLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LIF nor RBLX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LIF vs. RBLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Life360, Inc. and Roblox Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.

RBLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

RBLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported an operating income of -294.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.4%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

RBLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of -17.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIF and RBLX in my portfolio?

LIF and RBLX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIF or RBLX?

RBLX has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to LIF (16.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs RBLX's -82.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.