PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIF vs. ITRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIF vs. ITRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Integra Resources Corp (ITRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -27.95% return, which is significantly higher than ITRG's -37.41% return.


LIF

1D
-1.68%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-27.95%
6M
-38.40%
1Y
-26.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITRG

1D
-3.09%
1M
-7.72%
YTD
-37.41%
6M
-31.04%
1Y
46.78%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
-21.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIF vs. ITRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LIF
Life360, Inc.
-27.95%55.42%52.85%
ITRG
Integra Resources Corp
-37.41%360.97%-6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LIF and ITRG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIF:

$3.96B

ITRG:

$513.49M

EPS

LIF:

$1.75

ITRG:

$0.05

PE Ratio

LIF:

26.41

ITRG:

50.32

PS Ratio

LIF:

7.45

ITRG:

1.86

PB Ratio

LIF:

6.62

ITRG:

1.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIF:

$528.98M

ITRG:

$247.79M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIF:

$407.86M

ITRG:

$85.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

LIF:

$26.53M

ITRG:

$71.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIF vs. ITRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIF
LIF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ITRG
ITRG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ITRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITRG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ITRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIF vs. ITRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Integra Resources Corp (ITRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIFITRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.16

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

0.98

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

2.11

-2.79

LIF vs. ITRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the ITRG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIF and ITRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIFITRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.72

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.34

+0.83

Drawdowns

LIF vs. ITRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, smaller than the maximum ITRG drawdown of -93.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and ITRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFITRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.64%

-93.85%

+28.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.64%

-47.84%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.33%

-77.69%

+19.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-70.55%

+49.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.65%

22.21%

+17.44%

Volatility

LIF vs. ITRG - Volatility Comparison

Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 19.81% compared to Integra Resources Corp (ITRG) at 17.28%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFITRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.81%

17.28%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.75%

46.00%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.79%

64.92%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.14%

62.25%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.14%

60.45%

+2.69%

Dividends

LIF vs. ITRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LIF nor ITRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LIF vs. ITRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life360, Inc. and Integra Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
143.12M
60.87M
(LIF) Total Revenue
(ITRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LIF vs. ITRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Life360, Inc. and Integra Resources Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
77.3%
30.9%
Portfolio components
LIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.

ITRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integra Resources Corp reported a gross profit of 18.82M and revenue of 60.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

LIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

ITRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integra Resources Corp reported an operating income of 15.54M and revenue of 60.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.

LIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

ITRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integra Resources Corp reported a net income of 12.38M and revenue of 60.87M, resulting in a net margin of 20.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIF and ITRG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIF has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to ITRG (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs ITRG's -93.85%.

ITRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIF and ITRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer