LIF vs. IBTH
LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock, while IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past year, LIF returned -27.35% vs 3.20% for IBTH. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LIF vs. IBTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than IBTH's 1.39% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -15.73%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.57%
IBTH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.80M | $10.08M | $10.08M | |
| $29.00M | $30.44M | $34.94M |
LIF vs. IBTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -15.73% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 1.39% | 5.29% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and IBTH is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. IBTH — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
IBTH
LIF vs. IBTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.99 | -1.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 9.81 | -10.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 43.35 | -44.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. IBTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than IBTH's maximum drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and IBTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -16.16% | -49.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -0.38% | -65.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.26% | -0.90% | -50.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -6.57% | -16.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.00% | 0.09% | +44.91% |
Volatility
LIF vs. IBTH - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) at 0.21%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.79% | 0.21% | +16.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.79% | 0.59% | +50.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.22% | 0.99% | +69.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 4.15% | +59.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.18% | 4.15% | +59.03% |
Dividends
LIF vs. IBTH - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.47% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and IBTH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.79%) compared to IBTH (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs IBTH's -16.16%.
IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and IBTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer