LI vs. QQQ
LI (Li Auto Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, LI returned -17.12%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -26.82% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.95% return.
LI
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -22.03%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -26.16%
- 1Y
- -56.57%
- 3Y*
- -28.02%
- 5Y*
- -17.12%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
LI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | -26.82% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.95% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI and QQQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LI
QQQ
LI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.32 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.71 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 10.01 | -11.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.44% | -82.97% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.04% | -11.96% | -49.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.44% | -22.77% | -50.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.44% | -35.12% | -38.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.44% | -4.66% | -68.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.08% | -32.72% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.63% | 3.23% | +35.40% |
Volatility
LI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 11.71% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.71% | 9.17% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.65% | 14.54% | +14.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.33% | 17.95% | +21.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.38% | 22.69% | +40.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.21% | 22.41% | +45.80% |
Dividends
LI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LI and QQQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -73.44% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LI and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer