PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LI vs. FLOW.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

LI vs. FLOW.AS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LI (Li Auto Inc.) and FLOW.AS (Flow Traders BV) are both stocks. LI operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while FLOW.AS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LI returned -12.64%/yr vs -4.58%/yr for FLOW.AS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LI is traded in USD, while FLOW.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLOW.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -15.53% return, which is significantly lower than FLOW.AS's 3.18% return.

LI

1D
3.77%
1M
-25.79%
YTD
-15.53%
6M
-16.28%
1Y
-48.49%
3Y*
-23.14%
5Y*
-12.64%
10Y*
—

FLOW.AS

1D
2.94%
1M
-10.41%
YTD
3.18%
6M
8.68%
1Y
-9.18%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
-4.58%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LI
Li Auto Inc.		-15.53%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%11.34%86.00%
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV		3.18%32.16%13.51%-9.98%-34.02%22.11%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LI and FLOW.AS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Li Auto Inc.

Flow Traders BV

Often compared with LI:
LI vs. NIOLI vs. XPEVLI vs. BYDDYLI vs. 2015.HKLI vs. XIACYLI vs. TCEHYLI vs. VIPS
Often compared with FLOW.AS:
FLOW.AS vs. VIRTFLOW.AS vs. SPYFLOW.AS vs. SPHYFLOW.AS vs. URTHFLOW.AS vs. PGRFLOW.AS vs. QQQFLOW.AS vs. BTI

Return for Risk

LI vs. FLOW.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS
FLOW.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOW.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LIFLOW.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.26
-0.32

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-2.08
-0.23

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.96

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.38

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-0.71

-0.65

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the FLOW.AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and FLOW.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than FLOW.AS's maximum drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and FLOW.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LIFLOW.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.65%

-58.79%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.95%

-24.07%

-32.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.65%

-29.36%

-41.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.65%

-58.21%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.35%

-22.86%

-46.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.93%

-30.68%

-9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.41%

12.71%

+24.70%

Volatility

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Li Auto Inc. (LI) is 15.12%, while Flow Traders BV (FLOW.AS) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that LI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOW.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LIFLOW.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

16.08%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

22.22%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.30%

28.66%

+11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.52%

32.61%

+30.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.32%

32.78%

+35.54%

Dividends

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LI nor FLOW.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOW.AS
Flow Traders BV		0.00%0.00%0.70%6.12%4.85%10.87%16.81%6.27%6.11%5.00%4.73%1.10%
LI
Li Auto Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LI vs. FLOW.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Flow Traders BV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. LI values in CNY, FLOW.AS values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions

LI and FLOW.AS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI and FLOW.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer