LI vs. AAPL
LI (Li Auto Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. LI operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LI returned -12.64%/yr vs 18.59%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LI vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -15.53% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 7.29% return.
LI
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -28.57%
- YTD
- -15.53%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -50.47%
- 3Y*
- -23.14%
- 5Y*
- -12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
LI vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | -15.53% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 86.00% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 40.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI and AAPL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LI and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LI:
$14.50B
AAPL:
$4.30T
LI:
-CN¥1.74
AAPL:
$8.24
LI:
0.92
AAPL:
9.60
LI:
1.41
AAPL:
40.37
LI:
CN¥108.98B
AAPL:
$451.44B
LI:
CN¥17.42B
AAPL:
$216.07B
LI:
-CN¥2.83B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
LI
AAPL
LI vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.38 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 3.40 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 8.47 | -9.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.65% | -81.80% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.95% | -13.80% | -43.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.65% | -33.36% | -37.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.65% | -33.36% | -37.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.35% | -7.64% | -61.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.93% | -29.59% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.41% | 5.53% | +31.88% |
Volatility
LI vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.73%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.12% | 6.73% | +8.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 16.53% | +12.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.30% | 22.64% | +17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.52% | 27.52% | +36.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.32% | 28.92% | +39.40% |
Dividends
LI vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LI vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LI vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LI and AAPL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -70.65% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LI and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer