LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE
LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - LHKG.DE tracks the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LHKG.DE returned -1.66% vs 20.24% for CHIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LHKG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -8.36% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 3.48% return.
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- YTD
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- -1.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -8.36% | 21.50% | 20.39% | -9.96% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 3.48% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHKG.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between LHKG.DE and CHIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LHKG.DE
CHIN.DE
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LHKG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.30 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 5.60 | -5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHKG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -22.95% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.44% | -8.84% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.94% | -5.96% | -11.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.18% | -7.61% | -11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.21% | 3.62% | +7.59% |
Volatility
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) is 6.84%, while KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that LHKG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHKG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 7.38% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 13.49% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.31% | 18.68% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 22.48% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 22.48% | +1.50% |
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHKG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while CHIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.64% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHKG.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHIN.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LHKG.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for LHKG.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer