LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L
LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) and BULP.L (WisdomTree Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - LHKG.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while BULP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE returned 2.55%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for BULP.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LHKG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BULP.L.
Performance
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LHKG.DE is traded in EUR, while BULP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BULP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BULP.L's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE has underperformed BULP.L with an annualized return of 2.55%, while BULP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -8.89%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
BULP.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.60%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -6.38% | 21.50% | 20.37% | -17.49% | -7.90% | -6.59% | -10.39% | 16.35% | -8.73% | 22.42% |
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 4.05% | 42.23% | 32.24% | 7.34% | 4.17% | 1.47% | 9.47% | 20.08% | 1.43% | -3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHKG.DE and BULP.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, LHKG.DE and BULP.L have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LHKG.DE
BULP.L
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LHKG.DE | BULP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 1.60 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 4.09 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LHKG.DE | BULP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.16 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 1.04 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.71 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.51 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.71%, which is greater than BULP.L's maximum drawdown of -38.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and BULP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHKG.DE | BULP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.71% | -38.42% | -20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.64% | -17.23% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.41% | -17.23% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.07% | -17.23% | -25.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -21.57% | -23.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -15.66% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -14.57% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.15% | 6.74% | +2.41% |
Volatility
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that LHKG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHKG.DE | BULP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 5.08% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 20.18% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 23.63% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 16.78% | +8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 15.35% | +7.12% |
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BULP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHKG.DE vs. BULP.L - Dividend Comparison
LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while BULP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.61% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 3.04% | 2.30% | 3.38% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHKG.DE and BULP.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BULP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BULP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
LHKG.DE is categorized as China Equities, while BULP.L is Precious Metals. LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while BULP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LHKG.DE and 0.49% for BULP.L.
Find the right allocation for LHKG.DE and BULP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer