BULP.L vs. AUCO.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L).
BULP.L and AUCO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. AUCO.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2008. Both BULP.L and AUCO.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 9.64% | 50.05% | 26.15% | 5.12% | 9.83% | -4.73% | 15.76% | 12.89% | 2.70% | 0.05% |
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 11.69% | 161.75% | 20.02% | 9.27% | -4.09% | -9.30% | 18.16% | 38.67% | -5.12% | 0.49% |
Different Trading Currencies
BULP.L is traded in GBp, while AUCO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AUCO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULP.L achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than AUCO.L's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L has underperformed AUCO.L with an annualized return of 12.78%, while AUCO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.24% annualized return.
BULP.L
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.35%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
AUCO.L
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -10.18%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 30.25%
- 1Y
- 112.71%
- 3Y*
- 50.56%
- 5Y*
- 29.22%
- 10Y*
- 20.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank
BULP.L
AUCO.L
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULP.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.52 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 2.78 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 3.74 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 13.44 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULP.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.52 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.83 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.32 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULP.L and AUCO.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULP.L nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, smaller than the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -77.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULP.L and AUCO.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULP.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -78.40% | +33.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.88% | -30.56% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | -49.36% | +31.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.68% | -54.49% | +30.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -18.23% | +7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -42.76% | +26.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 8.72% | -4.38% |
Volatility
BULP.L vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) is 11.76%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 18.75%. This indicates that BULP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULP.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 18.75% | -6.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 36.68% | -15.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 44.47% | -19.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 35.12% | -18.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 34.17% | -17.95% |