LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE
LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) and C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) are both China Equities funds from Amundi - LHKG.DE tracks the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders while C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE returned 2.55%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for C024.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LHKG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for C024.DE.
Performance
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than C024.DE's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE has underperformed C024.DE with an annualized return of 2.55%, while C024.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.12% annualized return.
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -7.96%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
C024.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 16.25%
- 1Y
- 40.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -6.38% | 21.50% | 20.37% | -17.49% | -7.90% | -6.59% | -10.39% | 16.35% | -8.73% | 22.42% |
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 12.05% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.12% | 3.37% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHKG.DE and C024.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.64 |
The correlation between LHKG.DE and C024.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LHKG.DE
C024.DE
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LHKG.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.45 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 5.94 | -5.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 18.19 | -17.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LHKG.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 2.60 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.03 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.30 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.30 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.71%, which is greater than C024.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and C024.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHKG.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.71% | -49.68% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.64% | -6.78% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.41% | -25.82% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.07% | -40.47% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -47.10% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -8.55% | -7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -24.80% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.15% | 2.22% | +6.93% |
Volatility
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) at 5.71%. This indicates that LHKG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C024.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHKG.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 5.71% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 11.25% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 15.47% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 22.92% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 24.34% | -1.87% |
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than C024.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHKG.DE vs. C024.DE - Dividend Comparison
LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than C024.DE's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.69% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.61% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 3.04% | 2.30% | 3.38% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHKG.DE and C024.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while C024.DE tracks MSCI China A. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LHKG.DE and 0.25% for C024.DE.
Find the right allocation for LHKG.DE and C024.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer