LH vs. RSPT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LH (Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings) is a stock, while RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Over the past 10 years, LH returned 9.73%/yr vs 20.70%/yr for RSPT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LH vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LH achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 31.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LH has underperformed RSPT with an annualized return of 9.73%, while RSPT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.

LH

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: 6.49%
• 6M: 5.41%
• YTD: 12.97%
• 1Y: 15.83%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 9.73%

RSPT

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -5.20%
• 6M: 26.95%
• YTD: 31.56%
• 1Y: 46.40%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 16.47%
• 10Y*: 20.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LH vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LH Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings	12.97%	10.62%	2.22%	13.82%	-24.41%	54.37%	20.32%	33.88%	-20.78%	24.25%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	31.56%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LH and RSPT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between LH and RSPT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LH vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LH

LH Risk / Return Rank: 64
LH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LH Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LH Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LH Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LH Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 74
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LH vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LH	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.89	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.42	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.30	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	4.07	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	11.90	-9.82

LH vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LH Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the RSPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LH and RSPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LH vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LH drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than RSPT's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LH and RSPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LH	RSPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.15%	-58.91%	-37.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	-11.47%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.36%	-26.62%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.61%	-32.49%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.58%	-33.67%	-12.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-11.36%	+9.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.54%	-8.89%	-20.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.62%	3.91%	+3.71%

Volatility

LH vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) is 7.22%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that LH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LH	RSPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	8.83%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	20.68%	-4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.53%	24.64%	-1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.54%	24.70%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.68%	23.97%	+2.71%

Dividends

LH vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

LH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than RSPT's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LH Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings	1.02%	1.15%	1.26%	1.18%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.27%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LH and RSPT in my portfolio?

LH and RSPT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LH or RSPT?

RSPT has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to LH (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LH dropped -96.15% vs RSPT's -58.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.