PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LH vs. LHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LH vs. LHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LH achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LH has underperformed LHX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.91% annualized return.


LH

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
3.62%
6M
2.69%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
9.35%

LHX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
0.82%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
15.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LH vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LH
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
3.62%10.62%2.22%13.82%-24.41%54.37%20.32%33.88%-20.78%24.25%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
0.82%42.28%1.88%3.67%-0.48%14.98%-2.76%49.21%-3.38%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LH and LHX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1990

0.24

Fundamentals

EPS

LH:

$11.28

LHX:

$12.29

PE Ratio

LH:

22.93

LHX:

23.91

PS Ratio

LH:

1.53

LHX:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

LH:

$14.14B

LHX:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LH:

$4.01B

LHX:

$5.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

LH:

$1.90B

LHX:

$3.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LH vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LH
LH Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LHX
LHX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LH vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LHLHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.14

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

0.79

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

2.24

-2.22

LH vs. LHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LH Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the LHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LH and LHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LH vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LH drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than LHX's maximum drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LH and LHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHLHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.15%

-69.82%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-23.91%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-25.98%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.61%

-38.16%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.58%

-38.16%

-8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.41%

-21.80%

+11.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-21.33%

-8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

8.46%

-0.81%

Volatility

LH vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) is 6.20%, while L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that LH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHLHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

10.22%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

21.06%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.09%

25.32%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

24.19%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.66%

25.54%

+1.12%

Dividends

LH vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison

LH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than LHX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LH
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
1.11%1.15%1.26%1.18%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.67%1.64%2.21%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%

Financials

LH vs. LHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B20222023202420252026
3.54B
5.74B
(LH) Total Revenue
(LHX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LH vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
28.7%
24.4%
Portfolio components
LH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 3.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.7%.

LHX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

LH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings reported an operating income of 380.80M and revenue of 3.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

LHX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

LH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings reported a net income of 277.80M and revenue of 3.54B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

LHX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LH and LHX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LHX has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to LH (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LH dropped -96.15% vs LHX's -69.82%.

LHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LH and LHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer