LH vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LH or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between LH and COST is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LH vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LH:
0.19
COST:
2.43
LH:
0.45
COST:
3.01
LH:
1.05
COST:
1.43
LH:
0.16
COST:
4.45
LH:
0.53
COST:
11.50
LH:
8.03%
COST:
3.97%
LH:
22.04%
COST:
18.82%
LH:
-96.05%
COST:
-53.39%
LH:
-13.20%
COST:
-3.01%
Fundamentals
LH:
$19.21B
COST:
$435.99B
LH:
$5.28
COST:
$16.98
LH:
43.49
COST:
57.84
LH:
0.49
COST:
5.99
LH:
$12.71B
COST:
$258.81B
LH:
$3.37B
COST:
$32.80B
LH:
$1.41B
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LH achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 47.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LH has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 9.95%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.
LH
0.88%
-4.88%
10.27%
2.34%
10.24%
9.95%
COST
47.01%
4.92%
11.10%
46.43%
29.02%
23.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LH vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LH vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
LH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than COST's 2.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LH Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 1.27% | 1.18% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.02% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
LH vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LH drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LH and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LH vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LH vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities