LH vs. ABT
Compare and contrast key facts about Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LH or ABT.
Correlation
The correlation between LH and ABT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LH vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LH:
0.40
ABT:
0.09
LH:
0.75
ABT:
0.26
LH:
1.09
ABT:
1.03
LH:
0.33
ABT:
0.06
LH:
1.25
ABT:
0.20
LH:
7.04%
ABT:
8.15%
LH:
21.74%
ABT:
18.10%
LH:
-96.05%
ABT:
-45.66%
LH:
-8.17%
ABT:
-14.69%
Fundamentals
LH:
$19.97B
ABT:
$196.83B
LH:
$5.27
ABT:
$3.29
LH:
45.27
ABT:
34.49
LH:
0.51
ABT:
2.20
LH:
$9.68B
ABT:
$30.98B
LH:
$2.61B
ABT:
$17.29B
LH:
$1.36B
ABT:
$7.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LH achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LH has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 9.45%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
LH
4.03%
5.41%
13.56%
6.72%
10.29%
9.45%
ABT
0.85%
1.47%
12.34%
0.97%
6.87%
12.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LH vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LH
ABT
LH vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LH vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
LH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than ABT's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LH Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 1.51% | 1.57% | 1.18% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1.97% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
LH vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LH drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LH and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LH vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) is 4.01%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that LH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LH vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities