LGWIX vs. FMUAX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LGWIX (Ladenburg Growth Fund) and FMUAX (Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, LGWIX returned 8.32%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for FMUAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGWIX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FMUAX.

Performance

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGWIX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than FMUAX's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LGWIX has outperformed FMUAX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while FMUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.06% annualized return.

LGWIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 18.07%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 8.32%

FMUAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 5.56%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGWIX Ladenburg Growth Fund	10.15%	11.60%	4.69%	18.29%	-17.86%	16.38%	14.43%	22.94%	-8.35%	15.45%
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	6.76%	9.00%	8.70%	9.81%	-10.68%	10.32%	8.48%	15.16%	-5.24%	11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LGWIX and FMUAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2015	0.88

The correlation between LGWIX and FMUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGWIX vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGWIX

LGWIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
LGWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LGWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LGWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LGWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LGWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FMUAX

FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGWIX	FMUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	3.00	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	4.63	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.58	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.77	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.30	18.23	-6.93

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the FMUAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGWIX and FMUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGWIX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than FMUAX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGWIX and FMUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGWIX	FMUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.93%	-22.43%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-4.94%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.79%	-10.18%	-14.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.79%	-15.93%	-8.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.93%	-21.46%	-5.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.06%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-2.74%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	0.95%	+0.69%

Volatility

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison

Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that LGWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGWIX	FMUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	1.57%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.17%	4.86%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	6.23%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	7.21%	+7.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.69%	8.13%	+6.56%

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGWIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGWIX vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison

LGWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FMUAX's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	1.42%	1.23%	2.01%	2.53%	2.25%	4.56%	2.12%	4.00%	7.98%	2.17%	2.36%	2.80%
LGWIX Ladenburg Growth Fund	4.15%	4.58%	0.00%	3.43%	1.00%	2.45%	0.64%	1.61%	1.34%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGWIX and FMUAX in my portfolio?

LGWIX and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGWIX or FMUAX?

LGWIX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FMUAX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGWIX dropped -26.93% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.