LGWIX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
LGWIX is managed by Ladenburg Thalmann. It was launched on Aug 23, 2015. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGWIX Ladenburg Growth Fund | -3.17% | 11.60% | 4.69% | 18.29% | -17.86% | 16.38% | 14.43% | 22.94% | -8.35% | 15.45% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 8.59% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGWIX achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 8.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGWIX having a 7.31% annualized return and AAAAX not far behind at 7.28%.
LGWIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGWIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGWIX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
LGWIX
AAAAX
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGWIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.00 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.80 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 9.69 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGWIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.56 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.38 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGWIX and AAAAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
LGWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than AAAAX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGWIX Ladenburg Growth Fund | 4.73% | 4.58% | 0.00% | 3.43% | 1.00% | 2.45% | 0.64% | 1.61% | 1.34% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.26% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGWIX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGWIX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGWIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -40.47% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -9.55% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.79% | -22.62% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.93% | -29.41% | +2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -4.57% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -6.89% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.77% | +0.44% |
Volatility
LGWIX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Ladenburg Growth Fund (LGWIX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that LGWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGWIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.03% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 7.22% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 11.60% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 12.18% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 12.66% | +2.06% |