PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGRO vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGRO vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGRO vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LGRO
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF
-9.93%18.15%23.95%11.74%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
-3.17%10.23%17.09%5.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRO achieves a -9.93% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's -3.17% return.


LGRO

1D
3.01%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-9.93%
6M
-7.78%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OUSA

1D
1.44%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGRO vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGRO vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRO
LGRO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRO vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGROOUSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.45

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

0.74

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.75

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

3.10

+0.49

LGRO vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRO and OUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGROOUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.45

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.66

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between LGRO and OUSA is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LGRO vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

LGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than OUSA's 1.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGRO
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF
0.38%0.31%0.39%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.46%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Drawdowns

LGRO vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRO drawdown since its inception was -23.26%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRO and OUSA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGROOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.26%

-33.12%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.24%

-9.80%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.69%

-6.65%

-6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-3.53%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.39%

+2.18%

Volatility

LGRO vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that LGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGROOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

3.78%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

7.27%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.17%

13.88%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

13.31%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

15.15%

+4.42%