LGRO vs. OEFA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) and ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA).

LGRO and OEFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGRO is an actively managed fund by ALPS. It was launched on Aug 22, 2023. OEFA is a passively managed fund by ALPS that tracks the performance of the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Aug 18, 2015.

Performance

LGRO vs. OEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) and ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LGRO vs. OEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LGRO Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF	-9.93%	1.78%
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF	-5.17%	0.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRO achieves a -9.93% return, which is significantly lower than OEFA's -5.17% return.

LGRO

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -9.93%
• 6M: -7.78%
• 1Y: 16.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OEFA

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: -10.87%
• YTD: -5.17%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRO vs. OEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OEFA's 0.48% expense ratio.

LGRO

Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF

OEFA

ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

LGRO vs. OEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRO

LGRO Risk / Return Rank: 40
LGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
LGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
LGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRO vs. OEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) and ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGRO	OEFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGRO	OEFA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	-0.60	+1.42

Correlation

The correlation between LGRO and OEFA is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LGRO vs. OEFA - Dividend Comparison

LGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than OEFA's 0.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LGRO Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF	0.38%	0.31%	0.39%	0.26%
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF	0.98%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LGRO vs. OEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRO drawdown since its inception was -23.26%, which is greater than OEFA's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRO and OEFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRO	OEFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.26%	-13.54%	-9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.69%	-10.92%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-2.97%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LGRO	OEFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	16.43%	+6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	16.43%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	16.43%	+3.14%