LGRCX vs. RYGRX
LGRCX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX returned 13.95%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LGRCX charges 1.65%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.
Performance
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGRCX achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 13.95%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.
LGRCX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
RYGRX
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C | -6.93% | 12.90% | 33.77% | 49.68% | -28.62% | 17.50% | 30.41% | 30.47% | -3.53% | 31.39% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 18.58% | 11.00% | 25.73% | 5.80% | -28.71% | 26.61% | 26.34% | 34.13% | -6.28% | 23.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGRCX and RYGRX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LGRCX and RYGRX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGRCX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank
LGRCX
RYGRX
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGRCX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.96 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 4.03 | -4.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGRCX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRCX and RYGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGRCX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -54.22% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -17.01% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.96% | -24.95% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.31% | -36.57% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -36.63% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -12.64% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -9.38% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | 4.08% | +2.53% |
Volatility
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) is 5.36%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that LGRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGRCX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 10.93% | -5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 22.15% | -8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 24.88% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 24.47% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 23.34% | -2.12% |
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGRCX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGRCX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison
LGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than RYGRX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C | 3.33% | 3.10% | 7.70% | 8.01% | 21.28% | 5.81% | 5.14% | 2.60% | 6.05% | 2.18% | 1.36% | 0.00% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 4.29% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.81% | 4.43% | 12.10% | 7.15% | 6.26% | 0.05% | 2.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGRCX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYGRX has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to LGRCX (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRCX dropped -58.53% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.
RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGRCX and RYGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer