PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LGRCX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LGRCX and JLGMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.11%
11.24%
LGRCX
JLGMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LGRCX:

0.95

JLGMX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

LGRCX:

1.26

JLGMX:

1.79

Omega Ratio

LGRCX:

1.20

JLGMX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

LGRCX:

0.87

JLGMX:

1.82

Martin Ratio

LGRCX:

3.92

JLGMX:

6.66

Ulcer Index

LGRCX:

4.96%

JLGMX:

3.60%

Daily Std Dev

LGRCX:

20.42%

JLGMX:

18.54%

Max Drawdown

LGRCX:

-58.53%

JLGMX:

-39.64%

Current Drawdown

LGRCX:

-8.07%

JLGMX:

-1.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRCX achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's 3.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGRCX having a 8.96% annualized return and JLGMX not far ahead at 9.09%.


LGRCX

YTD

4.03%

1M

1.49%

6M

10.11%

1Y

21.36%

5Y*

6.62%

10Y*

8.96%

JLGMX

YTD

3.68%

1M

0.57%

6M

11.24%

1Y

26.31%

5Y*

13.68%

10Y*

9.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRCX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


LGRCX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C
Expense ratio chart for LGRCX: current value at 1.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.65%
Expense ratio chart for JLGMX: current value at 0.44% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.44%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGRCX vs. JLGMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LGRCX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LGRCX is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LGRCX is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LGRCX is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LGRCX is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LGRCX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLGMX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLGMX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLGMX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLGMX is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLGMX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLGMX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LGRCX, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.951.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for LGRCX, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.261.79
The chart of Omega ratio for LGRCX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.201.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for LGRCX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.871.82
The chart of Martin ratio for LGRCX, currently valued at 3.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.926.66
LGRCX
JLGMX

The current LGRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRCX and JLGMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.95
1.29
LGRCX
JLGMX

Dividends

LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

LGRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JLGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
LGRCX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
0.20%0.21%0.31%0.61%0.00%0.12%0.26%0.08%

Drawdowns

LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRCX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRCX and JLGMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.07%
-1.50%
LGRCX
JLGMX

Volatility

LGRCX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.72%
4.62%
LGRCX
JLGMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab