LGRCX vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LGRCX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX returned 15.21%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGRCX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

LGRCX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRCX achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.21%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.

LGRCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: -5.00%
• 6M: -6.38%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

VONG

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 18.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRCX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	-5.00%	12.90%	33.77%	49.68%	-28.62%	17.50%	30.41%	30.47%	-3.53%	31.39%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	1.56%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRCX and VONG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.90

The correlation between LGRCX and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGRCX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRCX

LGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 5
LGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
LGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
LGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 29
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRCX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGRCX	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.12	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.58	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.20	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	1.12	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.02	3.64	-2.62

LGRCX vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRCX and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGRCX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRCX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRCX and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRCX	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.53%	-32.72%	-25.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.16%	-16.23%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.96%	-23.27%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.31%	-32.72%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	-32.72%	-2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.30%	-6.82%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-4.88%	-6.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.87%	4.97%	+0.90%

Volatility

LGRCX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) is 5.69%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that LGRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRCX	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	6.04%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.20%	12.59%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	16.17%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.21%	21.45%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.21%	20.92%	+0.29%

LGRCX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRCX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRCX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

LGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	3.26%	3.10%	7.70%	8.01%	21.28%	5.81%	5.14%	2.60%	6.05%	2.18%	1.36%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRCX and VONG in my portfolio?

LGRCX and VONG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGRCX or VONG?

VONG has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to LGRCX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRCX dropped -58.53% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.