LGO vs. STZ
LGO (Largo Resources Ltd) and STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. LGO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LGO returned -13.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for STZ. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LGO vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGO achieves a -14.64% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LGO has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of -13.99%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 1.01% annualized return.
LGO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -28.57%
- YTD
- -14.64%
- 6M
- -20.00%
- 1Y
- -38.46%
- 3Y*
- -43.65%
- 5Y*
- -44.87%
- 10Y*
- -13.99%
STZ
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -13.90%
- 5Y*
- -7.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
LGO vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGO Largo Resources Ltd | -14.64% | -45.51% | -25.54% | -57.06% | -41.90% | -16.18% | 43.48% | -62.79% | 93.41% | 179.30% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 9.07% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGO and STZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
LGO:
$62.42M
STZ:
$25.79B
LGO:
-$1.00
STZ:
$11.23
LGO:
0.50
STZ:
2.84
LGO:
0.48
STZ:
3.08
LGO:
$109.89M
STZ:
$9.14B
LGO:
-$22.75M
STZ:
$4.71B
LGO:
-$16.54M
STZ:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGO vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
LGO
STZ
LGO vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGO | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.39 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -0.68 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGO vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGO drawdown since its inception was -99.12%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGO and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGO | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.12% | -67.39% | -31.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.24% | -26.51% | -43.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.24% | -51.28% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.53% | -51.28% | -44.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.86% | -53.53% | -44.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.06% | -42.57% | -56.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -16.60% | -65.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.43% | 15.01% | +29.42% |
Volatility
LGO vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.54%. This indicates that LGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGO | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 8.54% | +8.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.45% | 23.36% | +36.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.89% | 30.17% | +61.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.91% | 24.56% | +46.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.76% | 26.96% | +49.80% |
Dividends
LGO vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
LGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGO Largo Resources Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
LGO vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Largo Resources Ltd and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LGO vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison
LGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Largo Resources Ltd reported a gross profit of -3.52M and revenue of 22.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -15.8%.
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
LGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Largo Resources Ltd reported an operating income of -13.05M and revenue of 22.27M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.6%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
LGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Largo Resources Ltd reported a net income of -17.28M and revenue of 22.27M, resulting in a net margin of -77.6%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGO and STZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGO has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to STZ (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGO dropped -99.12% vs STZ's -67.39%.
STZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGO and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer