LGO vs. UAMY
LGO (Largo Resources Ltd) and UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, LGO returned -18.69%/yr vs 33.59%/yr for UAMY. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LGO vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGO achieves a -37.08% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LGO has underperformed UAMY with an annualized return of -18.69%, while UAMY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.59% annualized return.
LGO
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -24.36%
- 6M
- -52.63%
- YTD
- -37.08%
- 1Y
- -53.93%
- 3Y*
- -49.24%
- 5Y*
- -48.59%
- 10Y*
- -18.69%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.82%
UAMY
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -31.76%
- 6M
- -30.83%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 71.28%
- 3Y*
- 129.58%
- 5Y*
- 39.11%
- 10Y*
- 33.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $258.01K | $762.95K | $1.27M | |
| $26.13M | $31.95M | $72.73M |
LGO vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGO Largo Resources Ltd | -37.08% | -45.51% | -25.54% | -57.06% | -41.90% | -16.18% | 43.48% | -62.79% | 93.41% | 179.30% |
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation | 1.00% | 183.62% | 610.84% | -48.86% | -2.19% | -4.64% | 35.58% | -33.62% | 81.25% | 27.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGO and UAMY is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, LGO and UAMY have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LGO:
$43.80M
UAMY:
$751.30M
LGO:
-$0.96
UAMY:
-$0.12
LGO:
0.38
UAMY:
16.82
LGO:
0.35
UAMY:
5.44
LGO:
$109.89M
UAMY:
$39.04M
LGO:
-$22.75M
UAMY:
$4.34M
LGO:
-$16.54M
UAMY:
-$15.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGO vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank
LGO
UAMY
LGO vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGO | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.18 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 0.89 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 1.36 | -2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGO vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGO drawdown since its inception was -99.31%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGO and UAMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGO | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.31% | -96.44% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.87% | -74.30% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.54% | -74.30% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.53% | -80.46% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.33% | -89.76% | -8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.30% | -70.98% | -28.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -66.39% | -15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.17% | 48.56% | +2.61% |
Volatility
LGO vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) is 20.00%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that LGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGO | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.00% | 24.68% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.99% | 83.69% | -24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.41% | 130.50% | -38.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.63% | 95.37% | -23.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.59% | 101.21% | -24.62% |
Dividends
LGO vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGO nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LGO vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Largo Resources Ltd and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LGO and UAMY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAMY has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to LGO (20.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGO dropped -99.31% vs UAMY's -96.44%.
UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGO and UAMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer