LGO vs. LGO.TO

In the year-to-date period, LGO achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than LGO.TO's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LGO has underperformed LGO.TO with an annualized return of -13.93%, while LGO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher -11.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and Largo Inc. (LGO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the LGO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGO and LGO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LGO nor LGO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LGO drawdown since its inception was -99.43%, roughly equal to the maximum LGO.TO drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGO and LGO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) and Largo Inc. (LGO.TO) have volatilities of 21.98% and 21.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Largo Resources Ltd and Largo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.