LGLV vs. XLU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGLV returned 11.19%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for XLU. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.

Performance

LGLV vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 11.19%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

LGLV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 3.70%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 1Y: 10.51%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: 11.19%
• ALL TIME*: 11.95%

XLU

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: 3.92%
• YTD: 5.28%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 8.92%
• ALL TIME*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	$5.56M	$4.60M	$5.45M
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	$827.32M	$819.54M	$911.53M

LGLV vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	7.61%	8.37%	16.22%	9.19%	-8.17%	27.95%	7.42%	30.83%	0.32%	17.84%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	5.28%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and XLU is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013	0.54

The correlation between LGLV and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGLV vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGLV	XLU
Industrials	18.7%	-
Real Estate	17.8%	-
Utilities	11.8%	100.0%
Financial Services	10.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	-
Technology	9.0%	-
Healthcare	7.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	-

Return for Risk

LGLV vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGLV

LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 39
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 21
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGLV vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGLV	XLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.43	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	0.69	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.08	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	0.70	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	1.44	+1.97

LGLV vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLV and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and XLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGLV	XLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.64%	-51.98%	+15.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.86%	-9.18%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.17%	-13.15%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.49%	-25.26%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.64%	-36.07%	-0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-5.83%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-10.19%	+6.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	4.48%	-1.53%

Volatility

LGLV vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGLV	XLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	4.59%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	12.01%	-4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	15.00%	-4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	17.34%	-4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	19.30%	-3.21%

LGLV vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGLV vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than XLU's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	1.99%	1.94%	1.93%	2.03%	1.95%	1.65%	1.98%	1.89%	2.09%	4.39%	2.54%	2.97%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.70%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGLV and XLU in my portfolio?

LGLV and XLU have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGLV or XLU?

XLU has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to LGLV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs XLU's -51.98%.

Which ETF is better, LGLV or XLU?

On 10-year performance, LGLV leads with 11.19% vs 8.92% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGLV or XLU?

Over the 10-year period, LGLV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGLV or XLU?

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LGLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGLV or XLU?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.99% for LGLV.

What is the main difference between LGLV and XLU?

LGLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while XLU is Utilities Equities. LGLV tracks State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.08% for XLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.