LGLV vs. UGA
LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LGLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGLV returned 11.01%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for UGA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
LGLV vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 11.01%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.
LGLV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
UGA
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- 75.83%
- 6M
- 64.53%
- 1Y
- 82.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
LGLV vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 0.89% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 30.83% | 0.32% | 17.84% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.83% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and UGA is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013 | 0.14 |
The correlation between LGLV and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGLV vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
LGLV
UGA
LGLV vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGLV | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 2.35 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 2.78 | -2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 5.82 | -5.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 14.25 | -13.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGLV | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.35 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.39 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.12 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLV | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -86.59% | +49.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -14.88% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.17% | -26.68% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -38.11% | +20.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | -75.89% | +39.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -12.18% | +5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -36.77% | +33.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 6.08% | -3.44% |
Volatility
LGLV vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.48%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGLV | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 12.41% | -9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.59% | 30.41% | -23.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 35.21% | -26.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 34.38% | -21.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 37.27% | -21.21% |
LGLV vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGLV vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.04% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGLV and UGA have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to LGLV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.46% vs 11.01% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
LGLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while UGA is Oil & Gas. LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGLV and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer