LGLIX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
LGLIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | -14.54% | 16.49% | 44.97% | 33.29% | -38.73% | 8.62% | 77.55% | 35.02% | -1.08% | -0.46% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -14.54% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
LGLIX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -17.40%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGLIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
LGLIX
SWLGX
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGLIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.10 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.72 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 2.51 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGLIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.56 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLIX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | 2.33% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.83% | 9.27% | 8.01% | 19.82% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 4.84% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -32.69% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.01% | -16.16% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -32.69% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.01% | -16.16% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -7.13% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 4.62% | +2.18% |
Volatility
LGLIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGLIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 5.38% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 11.82% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 22.31% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 21.47% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 22.78% | +1.87% |