LGLIX vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
LGLIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | -14.54% | 16.49% | 44.97% | 33.29% | -38.73% | 8.62% | 77.55% | 35.02% | -1.08% | 31.64% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -14.54% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.30%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
LGLIX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -17.40%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGLIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LGLIX
QQQ
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.05 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.63 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.88 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 6.95 | -5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.05 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.58 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.85 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.37 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLIX and QQQ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | 2.33% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.83% | 9.27% | 8.01% | 19.82% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 4.84% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -82.97% | +37.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.01% | -12.62% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -35.12% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.95% | -35.12% | -10.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.01% | -8.98% | -12.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -32.99% | +23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 3.41% | +3.39% |
Volatility
LGLIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGLIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 6.51% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 12.77% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 22.67% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 22.39% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 22.25% | +2.40% |