PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLIX vs. LUBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
-14.54%16.49%44.97%33.29%-38.73%8.62%77.55%35.02%-1.08%31.64%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
0.40%4.99%5.70%5.16%-0.38%0.07%1.27%3.00%2.09%0.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -14.54% return, which is significantly lower than LUBYX's 0.40% return.


LGLIX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-9.21%
YTD
-14.54%
6M
-17.40%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
15.30%

LUBYX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
0.40%
6M
1.52%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBYX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGLIX vs. LUBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLIX
LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBYX
LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLIXLUBYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

3.09

-2.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

10.34

-9.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

3.37

-2.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

11.49

-10.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.66

46.88

-45.22

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the LUBYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and LUBYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLIXLUBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

3.09

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

2.36

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

2.18

-1.56

Correlation

The correlation between LGLIX and LUBYX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than LUBYX's 4.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
2.33%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%8.01%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
4.17%4.66%4.72%3.69%1.33%0.57%1.16%2.55%2.27%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than LUBYX's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and LUBYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLIXLUBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-2.59%

-43.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.01%

-0.40%

-20.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-1.86%

-44.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.01%

-0.30%

-20.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-0.17%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

0.10%

+6.70%

Volatility

LGLIX vs. LUBYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) at 0.33%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGLIXLUBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

0.33%

+7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

0.98%

+15.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

1.49%

+25.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.79%

1.34%

+24.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

1.11%

+23.54%