LGI vs. LZIEX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) and LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LGI is a Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard, while LZIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LGI returned 12.91%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for LZIEX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGI charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for LZIEX.

Performance

LGI vs. LZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGI having a 10.46% return and LZIEX slightly lower at 10.40%. Over the past 10 years, LGI has outperformed LZIEX with an annualized return of 12.91%, while LZIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.

LGI

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 2.85%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 6.84%
• 10Y*: 12.91%
• ALL TIME*: 8.36%

LZIEX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: 16.65%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: 8.27%
• ALL TIME*: 6.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	$696.26K	$637.90K	$669.54K
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LGI vs. LZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	10.46%	21.36%	14.00%	12.89%	-20.57%	25.28%	17.04%	30.25%	-10.51%	39.37%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	10.40%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LGI and LZIEX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2004	0.65

The correlation between LGI and LZIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGI vs. LZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGI

LGI Risk / Return Rank: 30
LGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LGI Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
LGI Martin Ratio Rank: 22

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGI vs. LZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGI	LZIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.54	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.16	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.90	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.37	6.55	-3.17

LGI vs. LZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the LZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGI and LZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGI vs. LZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGI drawdown since its inception was -63.34%, which is greater than LZIEX's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGI and LZIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGI	LZIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.34%	-55.35%	-7.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.25%	-11.88%	-9.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-13.71%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-30.42%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	-35.12%	-7.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.55%	-0.86%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-11.19%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.10%	3.45%	+2.65%

Volatility

LGI vs. LZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGI	LZIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	4.15%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	12.52%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	14.71%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.35%	15.88%	+3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	15.90%	+4.11%

LGI vs. LZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGI has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than LZIEX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGI vs. LZIEX - Dividend Comparison

LGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, less than LZIEX's 11.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.96%	10.08%	9.19%	7.32%	10.22%	9.77%	7.17%	6.44%	19.88%	5.46%	6.94%	8.52%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.19%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGI and LZIEX in my portfolio?

LGI and LZIEX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGI or LZIEX?

LZIEX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to LGI (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGI dropped -63.34% vs LZIEX's -55.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.