LGI vs. HGLB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) and HGLB (Highland Global Allocation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, LGI returned 6.80%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for HGLB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGI charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for HGLB.

Performance

LGI vs. HGLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGI achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than HGLB's -13.14% return.

LGI

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

HGLB

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: -13.14%
• 6M: -14.10%
• 1Y: -4.96%
• 3Y*: 9.17%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGI vs. HGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	8.78%	21.36%	14.00%	12.89%	-20.57%	25.28%	17.04%	19.18%
HGLB Highland Global Allocation Fund	-13.14%	51.74%	-1.52%	-6.15%	14.53%	53.22%	-17.98%	-31.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LGI and HGLB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019	0.34

Return for Risk

LGI vs. HGLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGI

LGI Risk / Return Rank: 23
LGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
LGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LGI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LGI Martin Ratio Rank: 16

HGLB

HGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2
HGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGI vs. HGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGI	HGLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	-0.24	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-0.20	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.97	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-0.21	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.97	-0.41	+4.39

LGI vs. HGLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the HGLB Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGI and HGLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGI vs. HGLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGI drawdown since its inception was -63.34%, smaller than the maximum HGLB drawdown of -70.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGI and HGLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGI	HGLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.34%	-70.40%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.25%	-23.34%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-23.34%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-29.88%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	-22.72%	+16.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.93%	-18.20%	+7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.95%	11.99%	-6.04%

Volatility

LGI vs. HGLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) is 3.82%, while Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that LGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGI	HGLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	6.02%	-2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	12.95%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.33%	21.16%	-4.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	22.11%	-2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.03%	27.62%	-7.59%

LGI vs. HGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGI has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HGLB's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGI vs. HGLB - Dividend Comparison

LGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, less than HGLB's 13.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HGLB Highland Global Allocation Fund	13.91%	11.57%	14.27%	12.82%	10.32%	9.39%	15.44%	11.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.99%	10.08%	9.19%	7.32%	10.22%	9.77%	7.17%	6.44%	19.88%	5.46%	6.94%	8.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGI and HGLB in my portfolio?

LGI and HGLB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGI or HGLB?

HGLB has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to LGI (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGI dropped -63.34% vs HGLB's -70.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.