LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 23.53% | 12.41% | 22.99% | -4.89% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and SSLN.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.13 |
The correlation between LGGG.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
SSLN.L
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 2.98 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 6.53 | +9.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.11 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.70 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.17 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -69.95% | +44.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -38.72% | +32.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -38.72% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -38.72% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -33.62% | +33.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -45.32% | +42.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 17.69% | -16.01% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 16.31% | -13.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 51.81% | -44.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 54.53% | -44.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 33.31% | -20.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 29.69% | -14.60% |
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGGG.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGG.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer