LFUS vs. POET
LFUS (Littelfuse, Inc.) and POET (POET Technologies Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LFUS in Electronic Components, POET in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, LFUS returned 16.03%/yr vs 4.73%/yr for POET. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFUS vs. POET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 85.34% return, which is significantly higher than POET's 69.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LFUS has outperformed POET with an annualized return of 16.03%, while POET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.73% annualized return.
LFUS
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 85.34%
- 6M
- 80.99%
- 1Y
- 111.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
POET
- 1D
- -11.25%
- 1M
- -26.46%
- YTD
- 69.51%
- 6M
- 50.07%
- 1Y
- 170.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
LFUS vs. POET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 85.34% | 8.65% | -10.98% | 22.71% | -29.38% | 24.46% | 34.51% | 12.74% | -12.63% | 31.39% |
POET POET Technologies Inc | 69.51% | 6.39% | 536.09% | -69.03% | -57.46% | 9.79% | 130.96% | 38.41% | 19.00% | -29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFUS and POET is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between LFUS and POET shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFUS:
-$1.60
POET:
-$1.11
LFUS:
4.70
POET:
568.61
LFUS:
$2.49B
POET:
$1.07M
LFUS:
$952.94M
POET:
$182.16K
LFUS:
$229.35M
POET:
-$59.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFUS vs. POET — Risk / Return Rank
LFUS
POET
LFUS vs. POET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFUS | POET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.31 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | 3.06 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.25 | 5.63 | +13.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFUS vs. POET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, smaller than the maximum POET drawdown of -93.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and POET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFUS | POET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.44% | -93.47% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -56.29% | +36.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.68% | -83.84% | +33.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.29% | -93.47% | +40.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.18% | -93.47% | +39.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -47.84% | +43.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.85% | -61.04% | +38.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 30.48% | -24.69% |
Volatility
LFUS vs. POET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) is 13.21%, while POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a volatility of 42.93%. This indicates that LFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFUS | POET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 42.93% | -29.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 123.24% | -92.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 142.01% | -104.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.58% | 107.71% | -73.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 99.43% | -64.25% |
Dividends
LFUS vs. POET - Dividend Comparison
LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while POET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 0.64% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 1.01% |
POET POET Technologies Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFUS vs. POET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and POET Technologies Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LFUS and POET have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POET has higher volatility (42.93%) compared to LFUS (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFUS dropped -82.44% vs POET's -93.47%.
LFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFUS and POET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer