PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LFUS vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LFUSWM
YTD Return-2.90%26.51%
1Y Return15.94%33.78%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.49%13.83%
5Y Return (Ann)8.02%17.06%
10Y Return (Ann)11.27%18.79%
Sharpe Ratio0.501.89
Sortino Ratio0.942.45
Omega Ratio1.111.41
Calmar Ratio0.462.84
Martin Ratio1.678.19
Ulcer Index8.55%4.10%
Daily Std Dev28.31%17.80%
Max Drawdown-82.44%-77.85%
Current Drawdown-20.02%0.00%

Fundamentals


LFUSWM
Market Cap$6.43B$89.95B
EPS$7.73$6.66
PE Ratio33.3533.65
PEG Ratio2.452.39
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.20B$21.39B
Gross Profit (TTM)$756.71M$7.35B
EBITDA (TTM)$416.88M$6.17B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LFUS and WM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LFUS vs. WM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LFUS has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 11.27%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.88%
6.75%
LFUS
WM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LFUS vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.67
WM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WM, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WM, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WM, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WM, currently valued at 8.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.19

LFUS vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFUS and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.50
1.89
LFUS
WM

Dividends

LFUS vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than WM's 1.32% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
1.03%0.93%1.03%0.64%0.75%0.95%0.93%0.71%0.82%1.01%0.97%0.90%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.32%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%3.25%

Drawdowns

LFUS vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.02%
0
LFUS
WM

Volatility

LFUS vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.42%. This indicates that LFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.13%
6.42%
LFUS
WM

Financials

LFUS vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items