LFUS vs. WM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFUS (Littelfuse, Inc.) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. LFUS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LFUS returned 16.50%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for WM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LFUS vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 92.36% return, which is significantly higher than WM's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LFUS has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 16.50%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.51% annualized return.

LFUS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 14.43%
• YTD: 92.36%
• 6M: 89.23%
• 1Y: 130.46%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: 16.50%

WM

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: -7.86%
• 3Y*: 11.27%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFUS vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc.	92.36%	8.65%	-10.98%	22.71%	-29.38%	24.46%	34.51%	12.74%	-12.63%	31.39%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	-0.38%	10.50%	14.28%	16.20%	-4.49%	43.82%	5.46%	30.45%	5.32%	24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LFUS and WM is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1992	0.23

The correlation between LFUS and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LFUS : $12.32B WM : $88.16B
EPS LFUS : -$1.60 WM : $6.91
PS Ratio LFUS : 4.88 WM : 3.47
PB Ratio LFUS : 4.90 WM : 8.80
Total Revenue (TTM) LFUS : $2.49B WM : $25.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) LFUS : $952.94M WM : $5.61B
EBITDA (TTM) LFUS : $229.35M WM : $6.96B

Return for Risk

LFUS vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFUS

LFUS Risk / Return Rank: 95
LFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

WM

WM Risk / Return Rank: 21
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 20
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFUS vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFUS	WM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.57	-0.43	+3.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	-0.48	+4.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	0.94	+0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.64	-0.46	+7.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.90	-1.04	+23.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFUS vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFUS Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFUS and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFUS	WM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57	-0.43	+3.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.58	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.80	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.36	0.00

Drawdowns

LFUS vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and WM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFUS	WM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.44%	-77.85%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.75%	-17.04%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.68%	-18.14%	-32.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.29%	-18.14%	-35.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.18%	-30.07%	-24.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-11.21%	+10.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.88%	-17.69%	-5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	7.92%	-2.20%

Volatility

LFUS vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.88%. This indicates that LFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFUS	WM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.84%	5.88%	+6.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.20%	13.57%	+15.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.04%	18.59%	+18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.34%	18.53%	+15.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.04%	19.49%	+15.55%

Dividends

LFUS vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than WM's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc.	0.62%	1.15%	1.15%	0.93%	1.03%	0.64%	0.75%	0.95%	0.93%	0.71%	0.82%	1.01%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	1.57%	1.50%	1.49%	1.56%	1.66%	1.38%	1.85%	1.80%	2.09%	1.97%	2.31%	2.89%

Financials

LFUS vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Littelfuse, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LFUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.15M and revenue of 656.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LFUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.17M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

LFUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of 75.15M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFUS and WM in my portfolio?

LFUS and WM have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFUS or WM?

LFUS has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to WM (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFUS dropped -82.44% vs WM's -77.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.