LFUS vs. MCHP
LFUS (Littelfuse, Inc.) and MCHP (Microchip Technology Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LFUS in Electronic Components, MCHP in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, LFUS returned 16.03%/yr vs 16.14%/yr for MCHP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFUS vs. MCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 85.34% return, which is significantly higher than MCHP's 47.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LFUS having a 16.03% annualized return and MCHP not far ahead at 16.14%.
LFUS
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 85.34%
- 6M
- 80.99%
- 1Y
- 111.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
MCHP
- 1D
- -9.20%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 47.96%
- 6M
- 44.27%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.14%
LFUS vs. MCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 85.34% | 8.65% | -10.98% | 22.71% | -29.38% | 24.46% | 34.51% | 12.74% | -12.63% | 31.39% |
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 47.96% | 14.61% | -34.96% | 30.90% | -17.98% | 27.49% | 33.73% | 48.02% | -16.71% | 39.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFUS and MCHP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 1993 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LFUS and MCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFUS:
-$1.60
MCHP:
$0.43
LFUS:
4.70
MCHP:
8.03
LFUS:
$2.49B
MCHP:
$4.71B
LFUS:
$952.94M
MCHP:
$2.72B
LFUS:
$229.35M
MCHP:
$1.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFUS vs. MCHP — Risk / Return Rank
LFUS
MCHP
LFUS vs. MCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFUS | MCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | 1.16 | +4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.25 | 3.06 | +16.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFUS vs. MCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than MCHP's maximum drawdown of -63.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and MCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFUS | MCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.44% | -63.77% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -34.41% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.68% | -63.77% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.29% | -63.77% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.18% | -63.77% | +9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -9.20% | +4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.85% | -16.70% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 13.02% | -7.23% |
Volatility
LFUS vs. MCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) is 13.21%, while Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a volatility of 20.70%. This indicates that LFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFUS | MCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 20.70% | -7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 34.78% | -4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 45.72% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.58% | 44.58% | -10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 42.11% | -6.93% |
Dividends
LFUS vs. MCHP - Dividend Comparison
LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than MCHP's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 0.64% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 1.01% |
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 1.95% | 2.86% | 3.16% | 1.76% | 1.65% | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.40% | 2.02% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 3.07% |
Financials
LFUS vs. MCHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFUS vs. MCHP - Profitability Comparison
LFUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.15M and revenue of 656.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
MCHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a gross profit of 967.30M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.
LFUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.17M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
MCHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported an operating income of 211.10M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
LFUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of 75.15M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.
MCHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a net income of 116.40M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFUS and MCHP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCHP has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to LFUS (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFUS dropped -82.44% vs MCHP's -63.77%.
LFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFUS and MCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer