PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LFUS vs. MCHP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LFUSMCHP
YTD Return-2.90%-17.92%
1Y Return15.94%0.95%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.49%-2.47%
5Y Return (Ann)8.02%10.44%
10Y Return (Ann)11.27%15.13%
Sharpe Ratio0.50-0.04
Sortino Ratio0.940.20
Omega Ratio1.111.02
Calmar Ratio0.46-0.05
Martin Ratio1.67-0.10
Ulcer Index8.55%12.97%
Daily Std Dev28.31%36.15%
Max Drawdown-82.44%-62.53%
Current Drawdown-20.02%-26.35%

Fundamentals


LFUSMCHP
Market Cap$6.43B$39.13B
EPS$7.73$1.41
PE Ratio33.3551.68
PEG Ratio2.456.74
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.20B$5.50B
Gross Profit (TTM)$756.71M$3.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$416.88M$1.54B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LFUS and MCHP is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LFUS vs. MCHP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly higher than MCHP's -17.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LFUS has underperformed MCHP with an annualized return of 11.27%, while MCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.88%
-19.54%
LFUS
MCHP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LFUS vs. MCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LFUS, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.67
MCHP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCHP, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCHP, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MCHP, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCHP, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MCHP, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.10

LFUS vs. MCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the MCHP Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFUS and MCHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.50
-0.04
LFUS
MCHP

Dividends

LFUS vs. MCHP - Dividend Comparison

LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MCHP's 2.46% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
1.03%0.93%1.03%0.64%0.75%0.95%0.93%0.71%0.82%1.01%0.97%0.90%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
2.46%1.76%1.65%0.98%1.07%1.40%2.02%1.65%2.24%3.08%3.16%3.16%

Drawdowns

LFUS vs. MCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than MCHP's maximum drawdown of -62.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and MCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.02%
-26.35%
LFUS
MCHP

Volatility

LFUS vs. MCHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) is 8.13%, while Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that LFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.13%
9.43%
LFUS
MCHP

Financials

LFUS vs. MCHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items