LFUS vs. MCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LFUS or MCHP.
Key characteristics
LFUS | MCHP | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -2.90% | -17.92% |
1Y Return | 15.94% | 0.95% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -6.49% | -2.47% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 8.02% | 10.44% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.27% | 15.13% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.94 | 0.20 |
Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.02 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Martin Ratio | 1.67 | -0.10 |
Ulcer Index | 8.55% | 12.97% |
Daily Std Dev | 28.31% | 36.15% |
Max Drawdown | -82.44% | -62.53% |
Current Drawdown | -20.02% | -26.35% |
Fundamentals
LFUS | MCHP | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.43B | $39.13B |
EPS | $7.73 | $1.41 |
PE Ratio | 33.35 | 51.68 |
PEG Ratio | 2.45 | 6.74 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.20B | $5.50B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $756.71M | $3.19B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $416.88M | $1.54B |
Correlation
The correlation between LFUS and MCHP is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LFUS vs. MCHP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly higher than MCHP's -17.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LFUS has underperformed MCHP with an annualized return of 11.27%, while MCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LFUS vs. MCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LFUS vs. MCHP - Dividend Comparison
LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MCHP's 2.46% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Littelfuse, Inc. | 1.03% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 1.01% | 0.97% | 0.90% |
Microchip Technology Incorporated | 2.46% | 1.76% | 1.65% | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.40% | 2.02% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 3.08% | 3.16% | 3.16% |
Drawdowns
LFUS vs. MCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than MCHP's maximum drawdown of -62.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and MCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LFUS vs. MCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) is 8.13%, while Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that LFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LFUS vs. MCHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities