LFUS vs. NVT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT).

Performance

LFUS vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LFUS vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc.	36.91%	8.65%	-10.98%	22.71%	-29.38%	24.46%	34.51%	12.74%	-7.54%
NVT nVent Electric plc	19.14%	51.27%	16.63%	55.98%	3.32%	67.15%	-5.68%	17.24%	0.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LFUS : $8.61B NVT : $19.89B
EPS LFUS : -$2.87 NVT : $4.33
PS Ratio LFUS : 3.61 NVT : 5.11
PB Ratio LFUS : 3.55 NVT : 5.33
Total Revenue (TTM) LFUS : $2.39B NVT : $3.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) LFUS : $906.04M NVT : $1.47B
EBITDA (TTM) LFUS : $137.46M NVT : $612.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 36.91% return, which is significantly higher than NVT's 19.14% return.

LFUS

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: 36.91%
• 6M: 34.64%
• 1Y: 81.04%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

NVT

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 19.14%
• 6M: 21.58%
• 1Y: 130.17%
• 3Y*: 43.00%
• 5Y*: 35.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LFUS vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFUS

LFUS Risk / Return Rank: 86
LFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

NVT

NVT Risk / Return Rank: 96
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFUS vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFUS	NVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.97	-1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	3.44	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.48	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	7.55	-4.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	24.79	-14.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFUS vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFUS and NVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFUS	NVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.97	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	1.02	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.69	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between LFUS and NVT is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LFUS vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than NVT's 0.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc.	0.85%	1.15%	1.15%	0.93%	1.03%	0.64%	0.75%	0.95%	0.93%	0.71%	0.82%	1.01%
NVT nVent Electric plc	0.67%	0.78%	1.12%	1.18%	1.82%	1.84%	3.01%	2.74%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LFUS vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and NVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFUS	NVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.44%	-56.18%	-26.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.86%	-17.71%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.29%	-46.67%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.27%	-4.53%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.98%	-12.05%	-10.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.43%	5.39%	+2.04%

Volatility

LFUS vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT) have volatilities of 16.19% and 15.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFUS	NVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.19%	15.86%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.48%	30.14%	-2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.80%	44.09%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.80%	35.03%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.75%	38.17%	-3.42%

Financials

LFUS vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Littelfuse, Inc. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LFUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 225.75M and revenue of 593.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 388.90M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

LFUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of -222.82M and revenue of 593.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.5%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

LFUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of -242.14M and revenue of 593.93M, resulting in a net margin of -40.8%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 118.90M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.