LFUS vs. NVT
LFUS (Littelfuse, Inc.) and NVT (nVent Electric plc) are both stocks. LFUS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while NVT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, LFUS returned 14.26%/yr vs 42.30%/yr for NVT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LFUS vs. NVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 92.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVT's 73.56% return.
LFUS
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 92.36%
- 6M
- 89.23%
- 1Y
- 130.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
NVT
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 73.56%
- 6M
- 68.60%
- 1Y
- 168.49%
- 3Y*
- 58.06%
- 5Y*
- 42.30%
- 10Y*
- —
LFUS vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 92.36% | 8.65% | -10.98% | 22.71% | -29.38% | 24.46% | 34.51% | 12.74% | -7.54% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 73.56% | 51.27% | 16.63% | 55.98% | 3.32% | 67.15% | -5.68% | 17.24% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFUS and NVT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LFUS and NVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LFUS:
$12.32B
NVT:
$28.93B
LFUS:
-$1.60
NVT:
$3.00
LFUS:
4.88
NVT:
6.69
LFUS:
4.90
NVT:
7.62
LFUS:
$2.49B
NVT:
$4.33B
LFUS:
$952.94M
NVT:
$1.60B
LFUS:
$229.35M
NVT:
$857.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFUS vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank
LFUS
NVT
LFUS vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFUS | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.57 | 4.22 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.19 | 4.55 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.60 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 10.01 | -3.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 35.14 | -12.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFUS | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | 4.22 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.19 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.82 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
LFUS vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and NVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFUS | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.44% | -56.18% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -16.93% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.68% | -46.67% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.29% | -46.67% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.88% | -11.84% | -11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 4.82% | +0.90% |
Volatility
LFUS vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison
Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 10.62%. This indicates that LFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFUS | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.84% | 10.62% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.20% | 31.26% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.04% | 40.19% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 35.85% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.04% | 38.34% | -3.30% |
Dividends
LFUS vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison
LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than NVT's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 0.62% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 1.01% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 0.46% | 0.78% | 1.12% | 1.18% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFUS vs. NVT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFUS vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison
LFUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.15M and revenue of 656.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
NVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
LFUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.17M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
NVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
LFUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of 75.15M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.
NVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFUS and NVT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFUS has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to NVT (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFUS dropped -82.44% vs NVT's -56.18%.
NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFUS and NVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer