PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFUS vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFUS vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFUS achieves a 92.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVT's 73.56% return.


LFUS

1D
-0.67%
1M
14.43%
YTD
92.36%
6M
89.23%
1Y
130.46%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
16.50%

NVT

1D
1.73%
1M
8.42%
YTD
73.56%
6M
68.60%
1Y
168.49%
3Y*
58.06%
5Y*
42.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFUS vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
92.36%8.65%-10.98%22.71%-29.38%24.46%34.51%12.74%-7.54%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
73.56%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LFUS and NVT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018

0.58

The correlation between LFUS and NVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFUS:

$12.32B

NVT:

$28.93B

EPS

LFUS:

-$1.60

NVT:

$3.00

PS Ratio

LFUS:

4.88

NVT:

6.69

PB Ratio

LFUS:

4.90

NVT:

7.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFUS:

$2.49B

NVT:

$4.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFUS:

$952.94M

NVT:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LFUS:

$229.35M

NVT:

$857.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFUS vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFUS
LFUS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFUS vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFUSNVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.57

4.22

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.19

4.55

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.60

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

10.01

-3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.90

35.14

-12.23

LFUS vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFUS Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFUS and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFUSNVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

4.22

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.19

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.82

-0.46

Drawdowns

LFUS vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFUS drawdown since its inception was -82.44%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFUS and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFUSNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.44%

-56.18%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

-16.93%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.68%

-46.67%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.29%

-46.67%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-11.84%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

4.82%

+0.90%

Volatility

LFUS vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 10.62%. This indicates that LFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFUSNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.84%

10.62%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.20%

31.26%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.04%

40.19%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.34%

35.85%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.04%

38.34%

-3.30%

Dividends

LFUS vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

LFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than NVT's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
0.62%1.15%1.15%0.93%1.03%0.64%0.75%0.95%0.93%0.71%0.82%1.01%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.46%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LFUS vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Littelfuse, Inc. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
656.97M
1.24B
(LFUS) Total Revenue
(NVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFUS vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Littelfuse, Inc. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20222023202420252026
38.7%
35.9%
Portfolio components
LFUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.15M and revenue of 656.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

LFUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.17M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

LFUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of 75.15M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFUS and NVT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFUS has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to NVT (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFUS dropped -82.44% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFUS and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer