POET vs. LWLG

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

POET (POET Technologies Inc) and LWLG (Lightwave Logic, Inc.) are both stocks. POET operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LWLG operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, POET returned 0.74%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for LWLG. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

POET vs. LWLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POET achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than LWLG's 86.73% return. Over the past 10 years, POET has underperformed LWLG with an annualized return of 0.74%, while LWLG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.38% annualized return.

POET

• 1D: -9.34%
• 1M: -27.01%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 8.85%
• 1Y: 10.59%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: -3.66%
• 10Y*: 0.74%
• ALL TIME*: -0.16%

LWLG

• 1D: -9.43%
• 1M: -23.32%
• 6M: 54.73%
• YTD: 86.73%
• 1Y: 129.17%
• 3Y*: -5.77%
• 5Y*: -9.49%
• 10Y*: 23.38%
• ALL TIME*: 11.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LWLG Lightwave Logic, Inc.	$19.97M	$34.19M	$75.66M
POET POET Technologies Inc	$102.70M	$124.25M	$462.57M

POET vs. LWLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POET POET Technologies Inc	8.85%	6.39%	536.09%	-69.03%	-57.46%	9.79%	130.96%	38.41%	19.00%	-29.75%
LWLG Lightwave Logic, Inc.	86.73%	54.29%	-57.83%	15.55%	-71.03%	1,500.00%	32.86%	-1.41%	-37.72%	83.87%

Correlation

The correlation between POET and LWLG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.15

Over the past year, POET and LWLG have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap POET : $909.57M LWLG : $932.18M
EPS POET : -$1.40 LWLG : -$0.25
PS Ratio POET : 287.90 LWLG : 2.21K
Total Revenue (TTM) POET : $1.07M LWLG : $243.11K
Gross Profit (TTM) POET : $182.16K LWLG : -$855.55K
EBITDA (TTM) POET : -$59.50M LWLG : -$14.17M

Return for Risk

POET vs. LWLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POET

POET Risk / Return Rank: 57
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 67
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 51

LWLG

LWLG Risk / Return Rank: 79
LWLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LWLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LWLG Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LWLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LWLG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POET vs. LWLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POET	LWLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	0.99	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.09	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.24	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.88	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.31	4.05	-3.74

POET vs. LWLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POET Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the LWLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POET and LWLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POET vs. LWLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POET drawdown since its inception was -93.47%, roughly equal to the maximum LWLG drawdown of -95.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POET and LWLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	POET	LWLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.47%	-95.76%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.50%	-67.33%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.03%	-88.04%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.29%	-95.76%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.47%	-95.76%	+2.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.50%	-69.07%	+2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.02%	-43.26%	-17.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.33%	31.21%	+2.12%

Volatility

POET vs. LWLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for POET Technologies Inc (POET) is 28.73%, while Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG) has a volatility of 34.09%. This indicates that POET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LWLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POET	LWLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.73%	34.09%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	122.79%	99.05%	+23.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.52%	127.85%	+12.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.86%	99.91%	+7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.76%	90.02%	+9.74%

Dividends

POET vs. LWLG - Dividend Comparison

Neither POET nor LWLG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POET and LWLG in my portfolio?

POET and LWLG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POET or LWLG?

LWLG has higher volatility (34.09%) compared to POET (28.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POET dropped -93.47% vs LWLG's -95.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LWLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.