LFST vs. PYPL
LFST (LifeStance Health Group, Inc.) and PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LFST operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LFST returned -15.06%/yr vs -26.85%/yr for PYPL. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LFST vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFST achieves a 48.86% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -1.38% return.
LFST
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- 6M
- 48.23%
- YTD
- 48.86%
- 1Y
- 176.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- -15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.82%
PYPL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- -14.01%
- 3Y*
- -8.58%
- 5Y*
- -26.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.32M | $33.60M | $37.81M | |
| $886.89M | $1.02B | $835.02M |
LFST vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 48.86% | -4.48% | -5.87% | 58.50% | -48.11% | -52.40% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -1.38% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -28.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFST and PYPL is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
LFST:
$4.06B
PYPL:
$50.47B
LFST:
$0.06
PYPL:
$5.25
LFST:
176.97
PYPL:
10.91
LFST:
1.82
PYPL:
0.53
LFST:
2.75
PYPL:
1.57
LFST:
2.80
PYPL:
2.60
LFST:
$1.49B
PYPL:
$34.13B
LFST:
$323.87M
PYPL:
$15.62B
LFST:
$83.67M
PYPL:
$7.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFST vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
LFST
PYPL
LFST vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFST | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 0.96 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.63 | -0.33 | +9.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.98 | -0.54 | +22.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFST vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFST drawdown since its inception was -86.91%, roughly equal to the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFST and PYPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFST | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.91% | -87.30% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -48.55% | +31.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.84% | -57.34% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.45% | -86.64% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.80% | -81.30% | +17.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.49% | -36.47% | -36.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 29.74% | -22.27% |
Volatility
LFST vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) is 10.48%, while PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a volatility of 17.17%. This indicates that LFST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFST | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.48% | 17.17% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.59% | 36.49% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.09% | 41.87% | +14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.28% | 42.88% | +24.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.02% | 39.15% | +27.87% |
Dividends
LFST vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
LFST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.24% |
Financials
LFST vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFST vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison
LFST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 403.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.
LFST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.28M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.89B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
LFST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.24M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.10B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFST and PYPL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to LFST (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFST dropped -86.91% vs PYPL's -87.30%.
LFST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFST and PYPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer