PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFST vs. GRAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFST vs. GRAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFST achieves a 34.09% return, which is significantly higher than GRAB's -30.66% return.


LFST

1D
2.55%
1M
27.74%
YTD
34.09%
6M
33.71%
1Y
90.32%
3Y*
1.64%
5Y*
-19.73%
10Y*

GRAB

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-30.66%
6M
-31.89%
1Y
-24.12%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
-21.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFST vs. GRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LFST
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
34.09%-4.48%-5.87%58.50%-48.11%-52.40%
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
-30.66%5.72%40.06%4.66%-54.84%-38.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LFST and GRAB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFST:

$3.73B

GRAB:

$15.37B

EPS

LFST:

$0.06

GRAB:

$0.09

PE Ratio

LFST:

158.72

GRAB:

39.47

PS Ratio

LFST:

2.46

GRAB:

4.21

PB Ratio

LFST:

2.52

GRAB:

2.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFST:

$1.49B

GRAB:

$3.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFST:

$323.87M

GRAB:

$1.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

LFST:

$83.67M

GRAB:

$481.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFST vs. GRAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFST
LFST Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LFST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LFST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFST Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GRAB
GRAB Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GRAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GRAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFST vs. GRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFSTGRABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.92

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.49

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

-0.86

+10.50

LFST vs. GRAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFST Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the GRAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFST and GRAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFST vs. GRAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFST drawdown since its inception was -86.91%, roughly equal to the maximum GRAB drawdown of -86.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFST and GRAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFSTGRABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.91%

-86.46%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.69%

-49.30%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.68%

-49.30%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.91%

-86.46%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.39%

-79.72%

+12.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-67.39%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

28.22%

-18.82%

Volatility

LFST vs. GRAB - Volatility Comparison

LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) at 11.04%. This indicates that LFST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFSTGRABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

11.04%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.78%

25.24%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.83%

37.85%

+17.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.37%

59.94%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.45%

60.37%

+7.08%

Dividends

LFST vs. GRAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither LFST nor GRAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LFST vs. GRAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Grab Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
403.48M
955.00M
(LFST) Total Revenue
(GRAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFST vs. GRAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Grab Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
43.4%
Portfolio components
LFST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 403.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GRAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.

LFST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.28M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

GRAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

LFST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.24M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

GRAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFST and GRAB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFST has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to GRAB (11.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFST dropped -86.91% vs GRAB's -86.46%.

LFST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFST and GRAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer