LFST vs. MFG
LFST (LifeStance Health Group, Inc.) and MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. LFST operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while MFG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, LFST returned -3.94%/yr vs 50.32%/yr for MFG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFST vs. MFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFST achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than MFG's 29.23% return.
LFST
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- -3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFG
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 31.21%
- 1Y
- 73.14%
- 3Y*
- 50.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
LFST vs. MFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 6.53% | -4.48% | -5.87% | 58.50% | -48.11% | -56.53% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 29.23% | 54.60% | 47.85% | 26.14% | 17.09% | -14.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFST and MFG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
LFST:
$2.96B
MFG:
$115.41B
LFST:
$0.06
MFG:
$101.00
LFST:
126.10
MFG:
0.09
LFST:
1.30
MFG:
0.00
LFST:
1.96
MFG:
0.01
LFST:
2.01
MFG:
0.01
LFST:
$1.49B
MFG:
$8.66T
LFST:
$323.87M
MFG:
$4.12T
LFST:
$83.67M
MFG:
$1.63T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFST vs. MFG — Risk / Return Rank
LFST
MFG
LFST vs. MFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFST | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 2.97 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 7.91 | -5.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFST | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.43 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.02 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
LFST vs. MFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFST drawdown since its inception was -86.91%, which is greater than MFG's maximum drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFST and MFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFST | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.91% | -80.57% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.30% | -24.78% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.68% | -28.33% | -31.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.09% | -6.24% | -67.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.77% | -60.91% | -11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 9.28% | +3.83% |
Volatility
LFST vs. MFG - Volatility Comparison
LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) has a higher volatility of 25.53% compared to Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) at 9.44%. This indicates that LFST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFST | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.53% | 9.44% | +16.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 23.65% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.02% | 30.33% | +24.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.44% | 29.59% | +37.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.44% | 26.47% | +40.97% |
Dividends
LFST vs. MFG - Dividend Comparison
LFST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.99% | 2.68% | 3.20% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 2.76% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.86% | 3.77% | 3.10% |
Financials
LFST vs. MFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFST vs. MFG - Profitability Comparison
LFST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 403.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
LFST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.28M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.
MFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
LFST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.24M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
MFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFST and MFG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFST has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to MFG (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFST dropped -86.91% vs MFG's -80.57%.
MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFST and MFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer